Lateral Epicondylalgia (Tennis Elbow)

Tennis elbow is one of the most common arm injuries we see โ€” and one of the most mismanaged. The name suggests a sports injury, but most people we see have never picked up a racquet. What they do have is a forearm that has been loaded repetitively in the wrong pattern, for too long, without the broader support structure doing its job. Our approach looks well beyond the lateral elbow.

Ready to get on top of this?

๐Ÿ“ž Call Now โ€” speak with our team

๐Ÿ—“ Book Online โ€” available 24/7

๐Ÿ“„ Free 2-Week Rehab Program โ€” request your copy


What Is Lateral Epicondylalgia?

Lateral epicondylalgia (LE) โ€” commonly called tennis elbow โ€” is pain arising at or near the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, the bony prominence on the outside of the elbow. The primary structure involved is the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) tendon, which originates here and controls wrist extension and stabilisation during gripping.

The condition is not inflammatory โ€” histological studies consistently show tendinosis (degeneration and disorganised collagen) rather than tendinitis (active inflammation). This distinction matters clinically: treatments aimed at reducing inflammation are addressing a mechanism that isn't the primary driver.

FeatureDetail
Prevalence1โ€“3% general population; up to 7โ€“10% in those aged 40โ€“60
Peak incidenceAges 35โ€“54
Work-relatedUp to 29% prevalence in high hand-demand occupations
Dominant armMost commonly affected
Episode durationTypically 6โ€“24 months; 5โ€“10% develop chronic symptoms
RecurrenceHigh with corticosteroid injection alone (72% recurrence within 12 months)

Characteristic features include pain with gripping, lifting, and wrist extension โ€” opening a jar, pouring a kettle, shaking hands, carrying bags. A positive Cozen's test (pain on resisted wrist extension) or Mill's test (pain on passive wrist flexion with elbow extended) are common clinical findings.


Who Typically Experiences This?

Desk Workers and Computer Users

Sustained mouse use and keyboard work require prolonged, low-level wrist extensor activation โ€” particularly in postures where the shoulder is elevated or the forearm is unsupported. Over time this creates a cumulative load through the ECRB attachment that exceeds its capacity to recover. This population often presents with a gradual onset rather than a single incident, and may not connect their elbow pain to their work posture.

Manual Trades and Physical Workers

Painters, carpenters, plumbers, chefs, and others who perform high-repetition wrist and hand movements throughout the day are disproportionately affected. The combination of force, repetition, and sub-optimal joint positioning creates a consistent overload pattern. Return to work without addressing the underlying movement strategy tends to result in recurrence.

Gym and Athletic Populations

Overhead athletes, racquet sport players, and gym-goers performing heavy rows, deadlifts, or loaded carries may develop LE when wrist extensor demand outpaces forearm endurance. In these presentations the motor control picture is often more prominent โ€” altered muscle activation at the shoulder, scapular instability, or grip compensation strategies contribute to the lateral elbow load. The cause is not always the elbow.

The Older Active Population

In those over 45, the tendon itself has reduced regenerative capacity, making LE more likely to become chronic without appropriate loading strategies. Passive approaches โ€” rest, anti-inflammatories, splinting โ€” typically fail to provide lasting benefit in this group.


The Fascial Lens: Why We See This Differently

Three Things Wrong at Once

Current understanding of LE recognises it as a condition with three interrelated components, not a single-tissue problem. Coombes, Bisset and Vicenzino (2009) proposed an integrative model that is now widely accepted in the research literature: (1) local tendon pathology, (2) changes in pain processing, and (3) motor system impairment. Each patient presents with a different balance of these three components โ€” which is why the same diagnosis in two people can look very different and respond to very different treatments.

The Fascial Environment of the Lateral Elbow

The ECRB tendon doesn't exist in isolation. It shares a fascial environment with the extensor digitorum communis (EDC), extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL), and the overlying deep fascia of the forearm โ€” all continuous structures that must slide, load, and transmit force together. When this fascial environment becomes densified โ€” when the hyaluronan-rich loose connective tissue between layers increases in viscosity โ€” the individual muscles and tendons lose their independent movement. Every grip, every wrist extension, every finger movement becomes a collective pull on a system that can no longer distribute load effectively.

In the Stecco model, the forearm region contains multiple myofascial units converging on the same lateral elbow territory. Densification at the relevant centres of coordination in the forearm extensor compartment can alter the force vectors reaching the ECRB attachment โ€” not through the tendon being weak, but through the broader fascial environment compressing it mechanically.

Trigger Points and Referred Pain

Research documents that patients with LE commonly have active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the forearm extensor muscles โ€” particularly ECRB, extensor digitorum, and brachioradialis โ€” that refer pain to the lateral elbow, mimicking or amplifying the localised tendon source. These trigger points are not a separate condition; they are part of the same overloaded, fascially restricted forearm environment.

The Motor Story Above the Elbow

The muscle activation work of Coombes and colleagues also identified consistent deficits in shoulder and scapular control in LE patients โ€” reduced rotator cuff and periscapular strength, and altered scapular kinematics during arm movement. The forearm extensor system cannot be separated from the chain above it. When the proximal chain is underperforming, the distal load increases. This is an area we specifically assess.

Why Cortisone Often Fails Long-Term

The landmark Bisset et al. (2006) BMJ trial is particularly instructive here. Corticosteroid injection produced significantly better short-term results at 6 weeks โ€” but by 52 weeks, 72% of injection recipients had relapsed, compared with 9% who chose a "wait and see" approach. Physiotherapy (manipulation + exercise) produced sustained improvement across the 12-month follow-up. This is not a failure of the injection itself โ€” cortisone reliably reduces pain short-term. It is a reflection of the fact that local tissue inflammation is not the primary ongoing driver. When the load management and fascial environment problems are not addressed, the tendon simply reloads in the same dysfunctional pattern.


What Does the Research Say?

The tendon pathology is degenerative, not inflammatory. The Lucado et al. (2022) Clinical Practice Guidelines confirm that histological findings in LE consistently show tendinosis โ€” collagen disorganisation, angiofibroblastic dysplasia, and neovascularisation โ€” rather than inflammatory infiltrate. Management aimed at reducing inflammation is therefore not addressing the primary driver. [146]

Physiotherapy outperforms corticosteroid injection at 12 months. The Bisset et al. (2006) Australian RCT (n=198) demonstrated that physiotherapy combining elbow manipulation with movement and exercise produced superior outcomes at 52 weeks compared to both corticosteroid injection and wait and see. The 72% recurrence rate in the injection group underscores the importance of addressing contributing factors, not just suppressing pain. [147]

LE involves more than a sore tendon. Coombes, Bisset and Vicenzino's (2009) integrative model documents evidence for three contributing components: local tendon pathology, pain system sensitisation (including central sensitisation and hyperalgesia at sites remote from the elbow), and motor system impairment (reduced grip strength, altered forearm and shoulder muscle activation). This framework directly informs our assessment. [148]

Manual therapy to the cervical and thoracic spine provides demonstrable short-term benefit. The Hoogvliet et al. (2013) systematic review found moderate evidence that cervical and thoracic spine manipulation as an add-on therapy produced short-term and mid-term benefit in LE โ€” consistent with the view that the elbow is part of a regional kinetic chain, not an isolated structure. [149]

Exercise is the mainstay of effective management. The Lucado et al. CPG supports wrist extension strengthening, eccentric loading, and progressive grip loading as Grade Bโ€“A recommended interventions. The evidence base supports exercise as the primary tool for restoring tendon capacity. [146]

Fascial Manipulation produces measurable structural change in the deep fascia of the elbow โ€” the first study of its kind. A 2020 study by Menon and colleagues (NYU School of Medicine + Johns Hopkins) used T1ฯ MRI mapping โ€” a technique sensitive to glycosaminoglycan and bound water content โ€” to image the deep fascia of patients with chronic elbow pain before and after Fascial Manipulationยฎ. A statistically significant difference was found in bound versus unbound water concentration following FM treatment, with unbound water decreasing in the deep fascia after treatment. This is the first time measurable structural tissue change has been demonstrated in the deep fascia following a manual therapy intervention, providing direct imaging evidence for the densification model โ€” the gel-to-sol transition of hyaluronan that FM is designed to address. [183]


How We Approach Lateral Epicondylalgia

Our assessment of LE aims to identify the relative contribution of tendon pathology, pain system changes, and motor control impairment in each individual presentation โ€” and to determine where in the kinetic chain the load is being amplified.

This typically includes:

Treatment is directed at:

We aim to address the entire load pathway, not just the point of pain. The goal is to restore the capacity of the forearm extensor system to tolerate the demands placed on it.

Please note: The information on this page describes our general clinical approach and is intended for educational purposes only. Individual presentations vary, and your assessment and management will be tailored specifically to you. Nothing on this page constitutes clinical advice for your individual situation. Please consult a registered health practitioner for advice about your specific condition.


What Can You Do Right Now?

1. Load it โ€” but load it carefully

Rest is not the answer. Tendons need progressive load to remodel. Start with isometric wrist extension (press your wrist back against a wall or your other hand, pain โ‰ค4/10) held for 30โ€“45 seconds, 5 repetitions, twice daily. Isometric loading has been shown to provide analgesia and stimulate tendon adaptation.

2. Check your work setup

Mouse position, desk height, and keyboard tilt all affect forearm extensor demand. The elbow should be close to 90ยฐ, the wrist neutral or slightly extended, the mouse light and close. Even small changes to prolonged posture can meaningfully reduce cumulative load through the lateral elbow.

3. Don't grip through the pain in the short term

Gripping with an already sensitised tendon reinforces the load-pain cycle. Use a wrist splint or tennis elbow strap during aggravating tasks to offload the ECRB origin temporarily โ€” but don't rely on it long-term, as it doesn't build capacity.

4. Address the region above

Simple shoulder and thoracic mobility work โ€” thoracic rotation, shoulder external rotation, scapular retraction exercises โ€” can reduce the demand on the distal chain. The elbow is often the loudest voice in a conversation that starts higher up.


Take the Next Step

Ready to get on top of this?

๐Ÿ“ž Call Now โ€” speak with our team

๐Ÿ—“ Book Online โ€” available 24/7

๐Ÿ“„ Free 2-Week Rehab Program โ€” request your copy


References

  1. Lucado AM, Day JM, Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, Fedorczyk J, Grewal R, Martin RL, et al. (2022). Lateral Elbow Pain and Muscle Function Impairments: Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 52(12), CPG1โ€“CPG111.
  2. Bisset L, Beller E, Jull G, Brooks P, Darnell R, Vicenzino B. (2006). Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial. BMJ, 333(7575), 939.
  3. Coombes BK, Bisset L, Vicenzino B. (2009). A new integrative model of lateral epicondylalgia. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(4), 252โ€“258.
  4. Hoogvliet P, Randsdorp MS, Dingemanse R, Koes BW, Huisstede BMA. (2013). Does effectiveness of exercise therapy and mobilisation techniques offer guidance for the treatment of lateral and medial epicondylitis? A systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(17), 1112โ€“1119.
  5. Menon RG, Oswald SF, Raghavan P, Regatte RR, Stecco A (2020). T1ฯ-Mapping for Musculoskeletal Pain Diagnosis: Case Series of Variation of Water Bound Glycosaminoglycans Quantification before and after Fascial Manipulationยฎ in Subjects with Elbow Pain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 708.